Double-Blinded Peer Review Process for the International Interdisciplinary Business Economics Advancement Journal

1. Introduction: The International Interdisciplinary Business Economics Advancement Journal (IIBEAJ) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of academic integrity and rigor in the publication of scholarly research. To ensure the quality and credibility of published articles, IIBEAJ employs a double-blinded peer review process.

2. Submission: Authors submit their manuscripts electronically through the journal's online submission system. During the submission process, authors are required to confirm that their manuscript has not been previously published and is not currently under review elsewhere.

3. Initial Screening: Upon submission, the editorial office conducts an initial screening to ensure that the manuscript complies with the journal's submission guidelines, including formatting and ethical standards. Manuscripts that do not meet these criteria may be returned to the authors for revisions or rejected outright.

4. Peer Review Assignment: After passing the initial screening, the Editor-in-Chief assigns the manuscript to at least two independent reviewers who have expertise in the relevant field of study. Reviewers are selected based on their academic qualifications, research experience, and absence of conflicts of interest with the authors.

5. Double-Blinded Review: Both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous throughout the peer review process. The identities of the authors are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa. This ensures an unbiased evaluation of the manuscript based solely on its academic merit.

6. Peer Review Evaluation: Reviewers critically evaluate the manuscript based on several criteria, including originality, significance, methodology, clarity of presentation, and adherence to ethical standards. Reviewers provide detailed feedback and constructive criticism to help authors improve their work.

7. Decision Making: Based on the reviewers' evaluations, the Editor-in-Chief makes a decision regarding the manuscript. Possible decisions include acceptance, minor revisions, major revisions, or rejection. Authors are provided with the reviewers' comments and are given the opportunity to revise their manuscript accordingly.

8. Revision and Resubmission: If revisions are requested, authors are given a reasonable timeframe to address the reviewers' comments and revise their manuscript. Upon resubmission, the revised manuscript undergoes further evaluation by the Editor-in-Chief and reviewers to ensure that the revisions adequately address the concerns raised.

9. Final Decision: Once the revisions have been satisfactorily addressed, the Editor-in-Chief makes a final decision regarding the manuscript. If accepted, the manuscript proceeds to the copyediting and production stages before being published in the journal.

10. Confidentiality and Integrity: Throughout the peer review process, confidentiality is maintained to safeguard the integrity of the review process. Reviewers are required to treat manuscripts as confidential documents and refrain from disclosing any information about the manuscript or their review to third parties.

11. Reviewer Recognition: Reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the quality and credibility of the journal. Their contributions are acknowledged and appreciated by the editorial board and the academic community.

12. Continuous Improvement: The peer review process is periodically evaluated and refined to ensure its effectiveness and efficiency. Feedback from authors, reviewers, and editorial board members is solicited and used to make improvements to the process.

By adhering to this double-blinded peer review process, the International Interdisciplinary Business Economics Advancement Journal upholds its commitment to excellence in scholarly publishing and contributes to the advancement of knowledge in the field of business economics.