Articles
| Open Access | Populism, Political Stability, And The Construction Of Tourism Destination Image In Contemporary Democracies
Abstract
The relationship between politics and tourism has long been acknowledged in both political science and tourism studies, yet it remains theoretically fragmented and empirically underexplored, particularly in the context of contemporary populism. In recent decades, populist movements and leaders have gained unprecedented power across Western democracies and emerging economies alike, reshaping political institutions, public discourse, and international perceptions of national identity. At the same time, tourism has become one of the most politically sensitive and economically consequential industries, deeply dependent on national image, political stability, and global reputation. This article develops a comprehensive theoretical and empirical synthesis of how populism and political instability interact with destination image formation and tourism competitiveness. Drawing strictly on the multidisciplinary literature provided, the study integrates political theory, particularly the work on populism, hegemony, and state legitimacy, with tourism research on destination image, risk perception, and country branding. The article argues that populism operates as a discursive and institutional force that reshapes how nations are perceived both domestically and internationally, thereby influencing tourism flows, investor confidence, and destination competitiveness. Through a qualitative and interpretive analysis of political discourse, institutional dynamics, and tourism perception frameworks, the study demonstrates that populist governance tends to produce volatile and polarized country images that simultaneously attract and repel different segments of the global tourism market. On the one hand, populist rhetoric may generate visibility, emotional engagement, and symbolic authenticity, potentially appealing to certain tourists seeking cultural or political novelty. On the other hand, populism often amplifies perceptions of political instability, nationalism, and social conflict, which are empirically associated with heightened travel risk perception and declining tourism demand. By synthesizing the political economy of instability with destination image theory and the politics of tourism governance, this article offers a unified conceptual model explaining how political ideology, state legitimacy, media narratives, and tourist psychology interact in the era of populism. The findings have important implications for tourism policymakers, destination marketers, and political leaders, suggesting that sustainable tourism development in the twenty-first century cannot be separated from the quality of democratic governance, institutional stability, and the strategic management of national image.
Keywords
Populism, destination image, political instability
References
ABC. (2018). Salvini and Di Maio seal the “Contract for the government of change.” https://www.abc.es/internacional/abci-salvini-y-maio-sellan-contrato-para-gobierno-cambio201805190253_noticia.html
Agaraj, X., & Murati, M. (2009). Tourism is an important sector of economic development. Annals-Economy Series, 1, 83–90.
Albertazzi, D., & McDonnell, D. (2007). Twenty-first-century populism: The specter of Western European democracy. Springer.
Chaulagain, S., Wiitala, J., & Fu, X. (2019). The impact of country image and destination image on US tourists’ travel intention. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 12, 1–11.
Chryssogelos, A. (2017). The people in the “here and now”: Populism, modernization and the state in Greece. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 473–487.
Echeverri, L. M., Estay-Niculcar, C. A., Herrera, C., & Santamaría, J. (2013). Desarrollo de marca país y turismo: El caso de estudio de México. Estudios y Perspectivas En Turismo, 22(6), 1121–1139.
Font, X., Torres-Delgado, A., Crabolu, G., Palomo Martinez, J., Kantenbacher, J., & Miller, G. (2023). The impact of sustainable tourism indicators on destination competitiveness: The European Tourism Indicator System. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(7), 1608–1630.
Gramsci, A. (1980). Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Wishart Publications.
Gupta, D. (1990). The Economics of Political Instability: The Effect of Political Instability on Economic Growth. Praeger.
Hadiz, V. R., & Chryssogelos, A. (2017). Populism in world politics: A comparative cross-regional perspective. International Political Science Review, 38(4), 399–411.
Hall, C. M. (1994). Tourism and politics: Policy, power and place. John Wiley & Sons.
Hall, C. M. (1996). Tourism and politics: Policy, power and place. John Wiley & Son Ltd.
Hall, C. M. (2001). Tourism and political relationships in Southeast Asia. In P. Teo, T. C. Chang & K. C. Ho (Eds.), Interconnected Worlds Tourism in Southeast Asia. Pergamon.
Jalilvand, M. R. (2017). Word-of-mouth vs. mass media: Their contributions to destination image formation. Anatolia, 28(2), 151–162.
Kyle, J., & Gultchin, L. (2018). Populists in Power Around the World. Tony Blair Institute for Global Change.
Lacatus, C. (2019). Populism and the 2016 American Election: Evidence from Official Press Releases and Twitter. PS: Political Science & Politics, 52(2), 223–228.
Legg, M. P., Tang, C. H., & Slevitch, L. (2012). Does political ideology play a role in destination choice? American Journal of Tourism Research, 1(2), 45–58.
Lopes, S. D. F. (2011). Destination image: Origins, developments and implications. PASOS. Revista de Turismo y Patrimonio Cultural, 9(2), 305–315.
Martínez, S. C., & Alvarez, M. D. (2010). Country versus destination image in a developing country. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 27(7), 748–764.
McGehee, N., & Meng, F. (2006). The politics of perception: Legislative images of the tourism industry in Virginia and North Carolina. Journal of Travel Research, 44(4), 368–378.
Ministère de l’intérior et des outre-mer. (2017). Les élections en France. https://www.archives-resultatselections.interieur.gouv.fr/resultats/presidentielle-2017/FE.php
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.
Pechlaner, H., Kozak, M., & Volgger, M. (2014). Destination leadership: A new paradigm for tourist destinations? Tourism Review, 69(1), 1–9.
Richter, L. (1989). The Politics of Tourism in Asia. University of Hawaii Press.
Robbins, S. (2000). Organizational Behavior: Concepts-controversies-applications. Prentice Hall.
Sanders, D. (1981). Patterns of Political Instability. MacMillan.
Seddighi, H. R., & Theocharous, A. L. (2002). Tourism Management, 23, 475–487.
Seddighi, M. R., Nuttall, M. W., & Theocharous, A. L. (2001). Does cultural background of tourists influence the destination choice? Tourism Management, 22, 181–191.
Siegel, B. (2009). What happens when you stop marketing: The rise and fall of Colorado tourism.
Sonmez, S. F. (1998). Tourism, terrorism and political instability. Annals of Tourism Research, 25, 416–456.
Sonmez, S., & Graefe, A. R. (1998). Influence of terrorism risk on foreign tourism decisions. Annals of Tourism Research, 25(1), 112–144.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2026 Elio Marquez Paredes (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.