
PRODUCTIVITY EFFECTS OF BANK MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS IN THE EU: A CAUSAL PERSPECTIVE
Abstract
This study investigates the productivity effects of bank mergers and acquisitions (M&As) within the European Union (EU) from a causal perspective. As the banking sector in the EU continues to undergo significant consolidation, understanding the implications of these structural changes on productivity is crucial for policymakers, investors, and stakeholders. The primary objective of this research is to assess whether and to what extent M&As influence the productivity of banks operating in the EU.
We employ a robust econometric framework to analyze data from a comprehensive sample of EU banks over the past two decades. By leveraging a difference-in-differences approach combined with propensity score matching, we aim to isolate the causal effects of M&As on bank productivity. This methodology allows us to control for confounding factors and ensure that the observed impacts are attributable to the mergers and acquisitions themselves rather than external influences.
Our findings indicate that M&As have a heterogeneous impact on bank productivity across different EU countries and bank sizes. On average, we observe a positive effect on productivity in the post- merger period, driven primarily by increased operational efficiencies and economies of scale.
Larger banks, in particular, tend to experience more pronounced productivity gains compared to their smaller counterparts. This suggests that scale economies and resource optimization play a significant role in enhancing productivity following M&As.
However, the study also uncovers variability in outcomes based on the type of merger and the specific banking markets involved. For instance, mergers involving cross-border transactions or consolidation within highly competitive markets demonstrate different productivity effects.
Additionally, the short-term improvements in productivity may not always translate into long-term sustainable gains, as integration challenges and market dynamics can offset initial benefits.
The implications of these findings are multifaceted. For regulators and policymakers, understanding the productivity implications of M&As can inform decisions related to market concentration and competition. For banks, the results highlight the importance of strategic planning and effective integration processes to realize the potential productivity benefits of M&As.
Keywords
Bank mergers, bank acquisitions, productivity effects
References
Alarco, G. (2018). "Mergers and acquisitions in Latin America 1990–2014: factorial distribution and contractionary impacts." Metroeconomica, 69(3), 681–706.
Allen, L., & Rai, A. (1996). "Operational efficiency in banking: an international comparison." Journal of Banking & Finance, 20(4), 655–672.
Altunbas, Y., & Molyneux, P. (1996). "Economies of scale and scope in European banking."
Applied Financial Economics, 6(4), 367–375.
Amel, D., Barnes, C., Panetta, F., & Salleo, C. (2004). "Consolidation and efficiency in the financial sector: a review of the international evidence." Journal of Banking & Finance, 28(10), 2493–2519.
Amewu, G., & Alagidede, P. (2018). "Do mergers and acquisitions announcements create value for acquirer shareholders in Africa?" International Journal of Finance & Economics, 23(4), 606–627.
Ayadi, R., Boussemart, J. P., Leleu, H., & Saidane, D. (2013). "Mergers and acquisitions in European banking: higher productivity or better synergy among business lines?" Journal of Productivity Analysis, 39(2), 165–175.
Barth, J. R., Caprio, G., & Levine, R. (2004). "Bank regulation and supervision: what works best?" Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13(2), 205–248.
Berger, A. N., & Mester, L. J. (1997). "Inside the black box: what explains differences in the efficiencies of financial institutions?" Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(7), 895–947.
Bonin, J., & Wachtel, P. (2003). "Financial sector development in transition economies: lessons from the first decade." Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 12(1), 1–66.
Brissimis, S. N., Delis, M. D., & Papanikolaou, N. I. (2008). "Exploring the nexus between banking sector reform and performance: evidence from newly acceded EU countries." Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2674–2683.
Carbó, S., Humphrey, D., Maudos, J., & Molyneux, P. (2009). "Cross-country comparisons of competition and pricing power in European banking." Journal of International Money and Finance, 28(1), 115–134.
Cavallo, L., & Rossi, S. P. (2001). "Scale and scope economies in the European banking systems." Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 11(4), 515–531.
Conyon, M. J., Girma, S., Thompson, S., & Wright, P. W. (2002). "The productivity and wage effects of foreign acquisition in the United Kingdom." Journal of Industrial Economics, 50(1), 85–102.
Du, K., & Sim, N. (2016). "Mergers, acquisitions, and bank efficiency: cross-country evidence from emerging markets." Research in International Business and Finance, 36, 499–510.
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). "Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing." Econometrica, 55, 251–276.
Hassen, T., Fakhri, I., Bilel, A., Wassim, T., & Faouzi, H. (2016). "Dynamic effects of mergers and acquisitions on the performance of commercial European banks." Journal of Knowledge Economics, 9, 1–17.
Haynes, M., & Thompson, S. (1999). "The productivity effects of bank mergers: evidence from the UK building societies." Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(5), 825–846.
Kao, C., & Chiang, M. H. (2001). "On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data." In Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 179–222.
Kao, C., Chiang, M. H., & Chen, B. (1999). "International R&D spillovers: an application of estimation and inference in panel cointegration." Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 691–709.
Klimek, A. (2014). "Results of cross-border mergers and acquisitions by multinational corporations from emerging countries: the case of Poland." East European Economics, 52(4), 92–104.
Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). "Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties." Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.
Lichtenberg, F. R. (1992). "Industrial de-diversification and its consequences for productivity." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18(3), 427–438.
Mark, N. C., & Sul, D. (2003). "Cointegration vector estimation by panel DOLS and long run money demand." Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(5), 655–680.
Montgomery, H., & Takahashi, Y. (2018). "Are bank mergers good news for shareholders? The effect of bank mergers on shareholder value in Japan." International Review of Finance, Berlin.
Nagano, M., & Ushijima, T. (2018). "What drives interregional bank branch closure? The case of Japan’s regional banks in the post deregulation period." International Review of Finance, Berlin.
Nurboja, B., & Košak, M. (2017). "Banking efficiency in South East Europe: evidence for financial crises and the gap between new EU members and candidate countries." Economic Systems, 41(2017), 122–138.
Article Statistics
Downloads
Copyright License
Copyright (c) 2024 Abdussalam Toumi (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.